Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

People

Big things are happening at Ogier. Change is embedded in everything we do. It is redefining our talent, our ways of working, our platforms of delivery, our culture.

Expertise

Services

We have the expertise to handle the most demanding transactions. Our commercial understanding and experience of working with leading financial institutions, professional advisers and regulatory bodies means we add real value to clients’ businesses.

View all services

Business Services Team

View all Business Services Team

Sectors

Our sector approach relies on smart collaboration between teams who have a deep understanding of related businesses and industry dynamics. The specific combination of our highly informed experts helps our clients to see around corners.

View all sectors

Locations

Ogier provides practical advice on BVI, Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Irish, Jersey and Luxembourg law through our global network of offices across the Asian, Caribbean and European timezones. Ogier is the only firm to advise on this unique combination of laws.

News and insights

Keep up to date with industry insights, analysis and reviews. Find out about the work of our expert teams and subscribe to receive our newsletters straight to your inbox.

Fresh thinking, sharper opinion.

About us

We get straight to the point, managing complexity to get to the essentials. Our global network of offices covers every time zone. 

No Content Set
Exception:
Website.Models.ViewModels.Components.General.Banners.BannerComponentVm

Power of shareholders to manage a company

Insight

20 September 2017

Jersey

ON THIS PAGE

RELATED

Save as PDF

A Jersey company's articles of association normally give its directors the power to manage the company's affairs, unless the shareholders intervene by passing a special resolution.  Two-thirds or more of the shareholders are required to pass such a resolution, depending on what the articles say. 

But can a simple majority of the shareholders ever direct the board how to manage the company?

This question was considered recently by the Royal Court of Jersey in Galasys plc [2016] JRC 188.  The Galasys board was unable to make certain key management decisions due to the directors' conflicts of interests.  Further, because of ongoing litigation involving the company, the shareholders were prevented by injunction from appointing additional directors.  A majority of the shareholders therefore passed an ordinary resolution directing the board to take certain actions with a view to breaking the deadlock. 

The Royal Court had to decide whether this direction, given by a simple majority of the shareholders, was valid.  In summary, the Court concluded that:

  • where the articles give the directors power to manage the company subject to the passing of a special resolution, a simple majority of the shareholders alone generally cannot intervene;
  • however, in exceptional situations where the board is unable or unwilling to act, a simple majority of the shareholders can, by ordinary resolution, exercise a reserve power.  This would arise where, for example, the board is deadlocked; there are no directors; a quorum of directors cannot be formed; or the directors are disqualified from voting;
  • this reserve power allows a simple majority of the shareholders to appoint additional directors so that the decision-making capability of the board is restored; and
  • if no new directors can be appointed (as was the case in Galasys), the reserve power also allows a simple majority of the shareholders to exercise management powers that would otherwise have belonged to the board.

Further, the Court inclined towards the view (but did not have to reach a conclusion) that the majority shareholders' reserved power may potentially extend more widely to taking substantive management decisions which the board is unable or unwilling to take, even if the board could be reactivated by new or replacement directors being appointed.

Whilst this case serves as a further endorsement of the established position that the overall management of the company rests firmly with its directors, it also cements the ability of a shareholder majority to resolve a deadlock when the directors are unable or unwilling to act and no new directors can be appointed. 

Perhaps more importantly, however, the case suggests a possible willingness by the Court to support (in the absence of an effective board) the exercise by a majority of shareholders of wider reserved management powers as an alternative to appointing new directors to resolve the issue.  Although potentially helpful in certain situations, any such development would raise important questions regarding the protection of the shareholder minority if a shareholder majority (with no fiduciary duties akin to those applicable to directors) was able to exercise substantive management power for its own benefit instead of re-empowering the board.  Such a development should, we would suggest, be approached with caution.

About Ogier

Ogier is a professional services firm with the knowledge and expertise to handle the most demanding and complex transactions and provide expert, efficient and cost-effective services to all our clients. We regularly win awards for the quality of our client service, our work and our people.

Disclaimer

This client briefing has been prepared for clients and professional associates of Ogier. The information and expressions of opinion which it contains are not intended to be a comprehensive study or to provide legal advice and should not be treated as a substitute for specific advice concerning individual situations.

Regulatory information can be found under Legal Notice

No Content Set
Exception:
Website.Models.ViewModels.Blocks.SiteBlocks.CookiePolicySiteBlockVm