Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility


Big things are happening at Ogier. Change is embedded in everything we do. It is redefining our talent, our ways of working, our platforms of delivery, our culture.



We have the expertise to handle the most demanding transactions. Our commercial understanding and experience of working with leading financial institutions, professional advisers and regulatory bodies means we add real value to clients’ businesses.

View all services

Business Services Team

View all Business Services Team


Our sector approach relies on smart collaboration between teams who have a deep understanding of related businesses and industry dynamics. The specific combination of our highly informed experts helps our clients to see around corners.

View all sectors


Ogier provides practical advice on BVI, Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Irish, Jersey and Luxembourg law through our global network of offices across the Asian, Caribbean and European timezones. Ogier is the only firm to advise on this unique combination of laws.

News and insights

Keep up to date with industry insights, analysis and reviews. Find out about the work of our expert teams and subscribe to receive our newsletters straight to your inbox.

Fresh thinking, sharper opinion.

About us

We get straight to the point, managing complexity to get to the essentials. Our global network of offices covers every time zone. 

No Content Set

Snapshot Privy Council upholds BVI Commercial Court on appropriate forum


01 December 2020

British Virgin Islands

1 min read


The Privy Council yesterday gave helpful guidance on the principles to be applied when seeking to stay proceedings on forum grounds – a common feature of BVI disputes. In doing so it upheld the "impressive ex tempore judgment" of the BVI Commercial Court Judge, Justice Wallbank, which dismissed attempts to stay the BVI proceedings.

The Board reaffirmed the application of the well-known principles derived from the Spiliada and the line of authorities that follow it but predominantly focused upon: (i) the availability of an alternative forum, in this case Russia; and (ii) the governing law of the underlying claims.

On the first point, the Board concluded that, when faced with conflicting written expert evidence as to the availability of Russia as an alternative forum, the Judge was justified in concluding that he could not make findings and therefore that the Defendants did not satisfy their burden.

On the second point, the Board concluded that: (i) the Claimant was not obliged to plead foreign law; and (ii) faced with numerous claims for conspiracy and dishonest assistance, the Judge was justified in concluding that the governing law was not knowable at that point in time.

This decision is a welcome demonstration of the availability of the BVI Courts to try complex international claims and the robustness of the specialist Commercial Court judges. It should also act as a useful practical warning to Defendants seeking to stay claims on the basis of written expert reports and/or arguments as to governing law.

Livingston Properties Equities Inc and others (Respondents) v JSC MCC Eurochem and another (Appellants) (British Virgin Islands) (

No Content Set