James Campbell
Partner | Legal
Jersey
Partner
Jersey
No Content Set
Exception:
Website.Models.ViewModels.Components.General.Banners.BannerComponentVm
The settlor’s widow brought an application to participate in proceedings instituted by a sub-trustee seeking relief in connection with a charitable trust and a compromise agreement in respect of issues arising under the settlor’s will. There appeared to be no Jersey case regarding the test for convening parties to proceedings concerning a charitable trust.
In determining the applicable principles, the Court noted that, although they related to a private trust, the Court’s observations in Re the E R O and L Trusts [2008] JRC 053 were a useful starting point:
The observations of Nicholls LJ in Re Hampton Fuel Allotment Charity [1989] 1 Ch 484, made in the context of Section 28 of the Charities Act 1960 (which provides that proceedings in relation to charities may be taken by “any person interested in the charity…”), were of assistance. Whilst a person having just a general interest should not be given leave to intervene, the Court may convene a person who has an interest materially greater than or different from that possessed by ordinary members of the public. The settlor would normally be such a person. As regards heirs and executors, the Court preferred the approach of Scottish law, under which (in contrast to English law) heirs - in which the Court included legatees - or executors of the founder of a charity have an interest which entitles them to see that the trust is properly administered.
This was not an easy matter, but on the balance of arguments, although the widow was not an executor and had only a small interest as a legatee, she was nonetheless in a good position to assist the Court as to the wishes and intentions of the settlor. Giving evidence was not as good as participating in proceedings - the former is essentially passive and depends upon being called as a witness, whereas an ability to receive and comment on other parties’ submissions in the context of the settlor’s wishes would be more effective and of more assistance to the Court. Apart from her interest as legatee and widow of the settlor, the widow had an interest greater than that of an ordinary member of the public as a shareholder of the Trust’s underlying company and of the trustee company. The widow should therefore be allowed to participate in the main proceedings.
This was the first time the Court was required to consider the test for convening parties to proceedings concerning a charitable trust and, given the appetite of high net worth individuals for establishing such trusts, it is helpful and reassuring to see that the Court is minded to allow settlors, heirs, legatees and executors to participate in proceedings, in particular where they can assist the Court as to the settlor’s wishes and intentions.
James Campbell
Partner | Legal
Jersey
Partner
Jersey
Josephine Howe
Partner | Legal
Jersey
Partner
Jersey
Ogier is a professional services firm with the knowledge and expertise to handle the most demanding and complex transactions and provide expert, efficient and cost-effective services to all our clients. We regularly win awards for the quality of our client service, our work and our people.
This client briefing has been prepared for clients and professional associates of Ogier. The information and expressions of opinion which it contains are not intended to be a comprehensive study or to provide legal advice and should not be treated as a substitute for specific advice concerning individual situations.
Regulatory information can be found under Legal Notice
Sign up to receive updates and newsletters from us.
Sign up
No Content Set
Exception:
Website.Models.ViewModels.Blocks.SiteBlocks.CookiePolicySiteBlockVm