Anna Snead
Counsel | Legal
London, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands
Anna Snead
Counsel
London, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands
In today’s global financial environment, it is becoming increasingly common for liquidators to have to look beyond their home jurisdictions to identify, secure and ultimately realise a company's assets.
One of the most powerful, but often overlooked, investigative tools in any office holder's armoury is the ability to apply to the court to examine a former director or officer of a company in liquidation, who has demonstrated a reluctance to cooperate.
As section 236 of the UK Insolvency Act 1986 has limited extra-territorial effect, office holders operating in a global context will likely be comforted by the fact that the BVI and Cayman Islands have shown a consistent readiness to support foreign office holders and provide ancillary relief to help identify and protect local assets and enable cross-border cooperation. Although neither the Cayman Islands or BVI have adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on cross-border insolvency, both have regimes which provide for the recognition of, and assistance to, foreign office holders.
In the Cayman Islands, sections 240 to 242 of Part XVII of the Companies Act (which deals with international cooperation), as supplemented by the Foreign Bankruptcy Proceedings (International Cooperation) Rules 2018, provide a statutory regime for the recognition and provision of assistance to foreign office holders. In order to fall within the ambit of Part XVII, the debtor must be:
Under this statutory regime, a foreign representative (defined as a trustee, liquidator or other official appointed in respect of the debtor) can apply for various ancillary orders to a foreign bankruptcy proceeding. These include orders:
The Cayman Court's power to make ancillary orders is discretionary and, in the exercise of that discretion, the Court will be guided by matters ensuring the "economic and expeditious administration of the debtor's estate" consistent with:
In cases falling outside of the Part XVII, often where a foreign office holder has been appointed in a non-place of incorporation, the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands will apply the common law principle of modified universalism as articulated in the Privy Council decision of Singularis Holdings Ltd v Price-waterhouseCoopers [2014] UKPC 36 to recognise and assist foreign insolvency proceedings.
The position in the BVI is somewhat different in that its recognition and assistance regimes are treated differently. With respect to recognition, although Part XVIII of the BVI Insolvency Act contains the UNCITRAL Model Law, providing for the recognition of foreign office holders, it is not in force and is unlikely to be in the foreseeable future. As a result, the UNCITRAL model law is not yet adopted in the BVI so any recognition of a foreign office holder in the BVI must be through the common law.
With respect to assistance, Part XIX of the BVI Insolvency Act, which is in force, provides a comprehensive code for the BVI Court to provide assistance to foreign office holders – but only those from certain designated jurisdictions – in specified types of insolvency proceedings. Prior to 18 September 2024, the list of designated jurisdictions for the purposes of Part XIX of the BVI Insolvency Act was limited to nine countries: Australia, Canada, Finland, Hong Kong, Japan, New Zealand, Jersey, the UK and the US. In a significant development, this list was expanded in September 2024 to include a further 24 counties, including other offshore jurisdictions.
The leading authority on the interplay of the dual regime of recognition and assistance in the BVI is the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal decision of Net International Property Ltd v Adv Eitan Erez (BVIHCMAP 2019/0010, 20 September 2021). In this judgment, the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal confirmed that recognition at common law remains available to foreign representatives from any jurisdiction, giving them standing before the BVI Court. However, the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal also held that Part XIX of the Insolvency Act provides a complete framework for assistance and therefore substantive assistance (including the power to examine former officers of a BVI company) can only be granted under Part XIX to representatives appointed in designated countries.
In accordance with section 467 of the BVI Insolvency Act, the relief available to foreign office holders who fall within the ambit of Part XIX is wide and includes:
The BVI Court's discretion as to whether to provide assistance is similarly guided by what will best ensure the economic and expeditious administration of the foreign proceeding, consistent with the:
With the exception that no order shall be made that is contrary to the public policy of the BVI.
Upon entering an insolvent liquidation, liquidators need to move quickly to identify, locate and take control of the company's assets.
In practice, this is often achieved by the liquidators working with the former officers of the company to understand how the company was operated - particularly in the months leading up to the liquidation - and to urgently identify and take control of the assets. However, in situations where the former officers refuse to engage with the liquidators, an important (and perhaps critical) factor will be the level of assistance a liquidator will receive from a foreign court.
With respect to both the Cayman Islands and the BVI, one important tool available to liquidators is the ability to seek an order requiring a person who has relevant information about the company to attend an examination.
This tool can be used extremely effectively to enable an office holder to fulfil his or her functions, including to:
The courts of the Cayman Islands and the BVI have demonstrated that they are willing to provide assistance to foreign office holders by making local orders for examination in support of the foreign insolvency in appropriate cases. However, there are differences in how each jurisdiction deploys the power.
For example, in the Cayman Islands, an order for examination can be made against a "relevant person" who has taken part in the promotion or management of the company. A distinction has been drawn in the Cayman Islands between "insiders" and "externals":
Recent Cayman case law has also confirmed that the power is aimed at assisting liquidators to undertake their statutory functions. It is not intended to be a tool to allow a liquidator to obtain disclosure from a foreign third party in order to obtain a special advantage over their opponents in litigation.
By contrast, in the BVI an order for examination in support of a foreign insolvency proceeding can be sought against a former director or officer but also extends to a broad group of persons. This group includes, a receiver, accountant or auditor of the company, or someone employed by the company during the relevant time.
A foreign office holder's power to examine a former director or officer is a powerful, yet often overlooked, tool. This is particularly true in cases of suspected misconduct, where written interrogatories or document production will not suffice. However, the differences in approach between jurisdictions, including how the power may be exercised, underscores the need to obtain local advice from experienced practitioners.
For further information or advice on the procedure for obtaining assistance in support of a foreign insolvency, including local orders for examination, in the Cayman Islands and / or BVI, reach out to our expert Restructuring and Insolvency team.
Ogier is a professional services firm with the knowledge and expertise to handle the most demanding and complex transactions and provide expert, efficient and cost-effective services to all our clients. We regularly win awards for the quality of our client service, our work and our people.
This client briefing has been prepared for clients and professional associates of Ogier. The information and expressions of opinion which it contains are not intended to be a comprehensive study or to provide legal advice and should not be treated as a substitute for specific advice concerning individual situations.
Regulatory information can be found under Legal Notice
Sign up to receive updates and newsletters from us.
Sign up