James Campbell
Partner | Legal
Jersey
Partner
Jersey
Big things are happening at Ogier. Change is embedded in everything we do. It is redefining our talent, our ways of working, our platforms of delivery, our culture.
Services
We have the expertise to handle the most demanding transactions. Our commercial understanding and experience of working with leading financial institutions, professional advisers and regulatory bodies means we add real value to clients’ businesses.
Sectors
Our sector approach relies on smart collaboration between teams who have a deep understanding of related businesses and industry dynamics. The specific combination of our highly informed experts helps our clients to see around corners.
We have the expertise to handle the most demanding transactions. Our commercial understanding and experience of working with leading financial institutions, professional advisers and regulatory bodies means we add real value to clients’ businesses.
Legal
Corporate and Fiduciary
Consulting
Banking and Finance
Corporate
Dispute Resolution
Employment law
Intellectual Property
Investment Funds
Listing services
Local Legal Services
Private Wealth
Property law
Regulatory
Restructuring and Insolvency
Tax
Banking and Finance overview
Asset Finance
CAYLUX Fund Finance
Debt Capital Markets
Derivatives
Fund Finance
Islamic Finance
Leveraged Finance
Listing services
Real Estate Finance
Regulatory
Restructuring and Insolvency
Structured Finance
Sustainable Finance
Corporate overview
Economic Substance
EIIS Services in Ireland
Equity Capital Markets
Insurance and Reinsurance
Listing services
Mergers and Acquisitions
Private Equity
Real Estate Structuring, Acquisitions and Disposals
Regulatory
Technology and Web3
Dispute Resolution overview
Banking Disputes
Corporate and Financial Services Disputes
Crypto Disputes
Enforcement of Judgments and Awards
Fraud and Asset Tracing
Funds Disputes
Insurance Disputes
International Arbitration
Regulatory
Restructuring and Insolvency
Section 238 Shareholder Appraisal Rights
Shareholder and Valuation Disputes
Trusts Disputes and Applications
Investment Funds overview
Hedge Funds
Managers and Sponsors
Private Equity
Real Estate, Infrastructure and Energy Funds
Regulatory
Sustainable Investing and Impact Funds
Technology and Web3
Local Legal Services overview
Cayman Local Legal Services
Channel Islands Local Legal Services
Ireland Local Legal Services
Employment law
Estate Planning, Wills and Probate
Expat services
Family Office
Intellectual Property
Make your Guernsey will online
Make your Jersey lasting power of attorney online
Make your Jersey will online
Notary public services
Relocating your business
Relocating your family
Property law
Accounting and Financial Reporting Services - Ogier Global
Cayman Islands AML/CFT training - Ogier Global
Corporate Services - Ogier Global
Debt Capital Markets - Ogier Global
Fund Services - Ogier Global
Governance Services - Ogier Global
Investor Services - Ogier Global
Ogier Connect - Ogier Global
Private Wealth Services - Ogier Global
Real Estate Services - Ogier Global
Regulatory and Compliance Services - Ogier Global
Our sector approach relies on smart collaboration between teams who have a deep understanding of related businesses and industry dynamics. The specific combination of our highly informed experts helps our clients to see around corners.
Ogier provides practical advice on BVI, Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Irish, Jersey and Luxembourg law through our global network of offices across the Asian, Caribbean and European timezones. Ogier is the only firm to advise on this unique combination of laws.
Keep up to date with industry insights, analysis and reviews. Find out about the work of our expert teams and subscribe to receive our newsletters straight to your inbox.
Fresh thinking, sharper opinion.
We get straight to the point, managing complexity to get to the essentials. Our global network of offices covers every time zone.
No Content Set
Exception:
Website.Models.ViewModels.Components.General.Banners.BannerComponentVm
Insight
24 July 2014
Jersey
ON THIS PAGE
This judgment relates to:
The new trustee and manager issued an Order of Justice against the former trustee and manager, claiming that the latter were liable to compensate the three relevant unit trusts in respect of breaches of trust, fiduciary duty and contract committed in the course of their trusteeship and management of the three unit trusts.
The Order of Justice claimed that, by virtue of its office as manager of the funds, the former manager was co-trustee of the funds with the former trustee and owed duties as trustee to all unitholders of each fund. It also claimed that (a) the former manager was subject to the express duties and responsibilities as manager set out in the trust instrument and that (b) under the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984 it was subject to the statutory duties already set out in relation to the former trustee.
The Order of Justice further claimed that the former manager was a fiduciary office holder and owed fiduciary duties to the unitholders as well as equitable duties of care and skill.
It was also claimed that by each of the trust instruments a contract was formed between the manager and the unitholders such that, by virtue of its office as manager of the funds, the former manager owed duties in contract to all unitholders of each fund. As such, it was subject to the express duties and responsibilities in contract set out in the trust instrument and it was also subject to an implied duty of care and skill in the discharge of its functions as a manager.
The court focussed upon:
The court found that generally, a unit trust can be expected to establish a triangular relationship between the manager, the trustee and the unitholders. The court recognised the contractual origins of the relationship, and that the unit trust operates as a trust. The court also found that the trustee and the manager owe trustee-like or fiduciary duties and obligations to the unitholders as:
The court went on to hold that trust instruments are capable of creating contractual obligations enforceable between the trustee and the manager of a unit trust, and that if the trust instrument expressly provides that such obligations are made for the benefit of the unitholders, this means successor trustees and successor managers would have locus standi to enforce those obligations against their predecessors.
The court held that it is at least arguable that the manager of a unit trust is liable as a trustee. In this particular case, it was noted that virtually all trustee-like functions were allocated to the manager, and the fact that the manager was not registered as a trustee, nor was it insured to act as a trustee, was irrelevant.
The court found in this case that the manager of the unit trust was a trustee and therefore had locus standi to bring the claim, particularly as the nominate trustee was required to act on the directions of the manager. The court held that it was unreasonable to insist upon the nominate trustee being the sole plaintiff where the nominate trustee was acting in accordance with decisions made by the manager in relation to the litigation.
Further to this, the court found that, going forward, the common law in this area should develop so that a court should be able to impose equitable remedies upon managers as if they were trustees.
The court held that if the successor trustee and the successor manager were able to show that there was a sufficient relationship of trust and confidence between the unitholders and the prior manager, that would give the unitholders the right to enforce the manager's obligations and to claim equitable remedies in respect of their breach.
The court held that the locus standi of a successor trustee to sue a former trustee does not depend on the breach having any particular character as a breach of a fiduciary duty. It applies generally to breaches of trust of all kinds. It went on to hold that despite the allegations made in this case being of two kinds: (1) unauthorized payments by companies comprised (indirectly) in the trust funds and (2) breaches of a duty of care owed to the beneficiaries of the trust; a successor trustee may legitimately make both.
The court found that it is arguable that any trustee of a unit trust, including a custodian, has a residual duty owed to the unitholders as beneficiaries to challenge unauthorised instructions of the manager. The court stipulated that this duty applies not only where the trustee had actual knowledge of relevant facts but also where it ought to have had that knowledge if it had complied with the statutory duty of diligence.
This is a noteworthy case for Jersey. There are a significant number of Jersey Property Unit Trusts being administered in the Island, invariably with both a trustee and a manager in place. This judgment provides helpful guidance on the duties, responsibilities and potential liabilities of both the trustee and, significantly, the manager. The comment at the end of this note in relation to a trustee's residual duty to challenge unauthorised transactions of which it ought to have notice may have relevance also, in the author's view, in the area of reserved powers, and the argument that in a reserved powers trust the trustee has a residual duty when provided with prescribed directions from a power holder to ensure no salvage or emergency situation has arisen by virtue of any direction.
James Campbell
Partner | Legal
Jersey
Partner
Jersey
Contact James
Back
Edward Mackereth
Global Managing Partner | Legal
Jersey
Global Managing Partner
Jersey
Contact Edward
Back
Nick Williams
Partner | Legal
Jersey
Partner
Jersey
Contact Nick
Back
Kate Hodson 凯特 ·赫臣
Partner and Head of ESG (Legal) 合伙人 | Legal
Hong Kong
Partner and Head of ESG (Legal) 合伙人
Hong Kong
Contact Kate
Back
Ogier is a professional services firm with the knowledge and expertise to handle the most demanding and complex transactions and provide expert, efficient and cost-effective services to all our clients. We regularly win awards for the quality of our client service, our work and our people.
This client briefing has been prepared for clients and professional associates of Ogier. The information and expressions of opinion which it contains are not intended to be a comprehensive study or to provide legal advice and should not be treated as a substitute for specific advice concerning individual situations.
Regulatory information can be found under Legal Notice
Sign up to receive updates and newsletters from us.
Sign up
No Content Set
Exception:
Website.Models.ViewModels.Blocks.SiteBlocks.CookiePolicySiteBlockVm