Helen Ruelle
Director of Local Legal Services | Legal
Jersey
Director of Local Legal Services
Jersey
Big things are happening at Ogier. Change is embedded in everything we do. It is redefining our talent, our ways of working, our platforms of delivery, our culture.
Services
We have the expertise to handle the most demanding transactions. Our commercial understanding and experience of working with leading financial institutions, professional advisers and regulatory bodies means we add real value to clients’ businesses.
Sectors
Our sector approach relies on smart collaboration between teams who have a deep understanding of related businesses and industry dynamics. The specific combination of our highly informed experts helps our clients to see around corners.
We have the expertise to handle the most demanding transactions. Our commercial understanding and experience of working with leading financial institutions, professional advisers and regulatory bodies means we add real value to clients’ businesses.
Legal
Corporate and Fiduciary
Consulting
Banking and Finance
Corporate
Dispute Resolution
Employment law
Intellectual Property
Investment Funds
Listing services
Local Legal Services
Private Wealth
Property law
Regulatory
Restructuring and Insolvency
Tax
Banking and Finance overview
Asset Finance
CAYLUX Fund Finance
Debt Capital Markets
Derivatives
Fund Finance
Islamic Finance
Leveraged Finance
Listing services
Real Estate Finance
Regulatory
Restructuring and Insolvency
Structured Finance
Sustainable Finance
Corporate overview
Economic Substance
EIIS Services in Ireland
Equity Capital Markets
Insurance and Reinsurance
Listing services
Mergers and Acquisitions
Private Equity
Real Estate Structuring, Acquisitions and Disposals
Regulatory
Technology and Web3
Dispute Resolution overview
Banking Disputes
Corporate and Financial Services Disputes
Crypto Disputes
Enforcement of Judgments and Awards
Fraud and Asset Tracing
Funds Disputes
Insurance Disputes
International Arbitration
Regulatory
Restructuring and Insolvency
Section 238 Shareholder Appraisal Rights
Shareholder and Valuation Disputes
Trusts Disputes and Applications
Investment Funds overview
Hedge Funds
Managers and Sponsors
Private Equity
Real Estate, Infrastructure and Energy Funds
Regulatory
Sustainable Investing and Impact Funds
Technology and Web3
Local Legal Services overview
Cayman Local Legal Services
Channel Islands Local Legal Services
Ireland Local Legal Services
Employment law
Estate Planning, Wills and Probate
Expat services
Family Office
Intellectual Property
Make your Guernsey will online
Make your Jersey lasting power of attorney online
Make your Jersey will online
Notary public services
Relocating your business
Relocating your family
Property law
Accounting and Financial Reporting Services - Ogier Global
Cayman Islands AML/CFT training - Ogier Global
Corporate Services - Ogier Global
Debt Capital Markets - Ogier Global
Fund Services - Ogier Global
Governance Services - Ogier Global
Investor Services - Ogier Global
Ogier Connect - Ogier Global
Private Wealth Services - Ogier Global
Real Estate Services - Ogier Global
Regulatory and Compliance Services - Ogier Global
Our sector approach relies on smart collaboration between teams who have a deep understanding of related businesses and industry dynamics. The specific combination of our highly informed experts helps our clients to see around corners.
Ogier provides practical advice on BVI, Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Irish, Jersey and Luxembourg law through our global network of offices across the Asian, Caribbean and European timezones. Ogier is the only firm to advise on this unique combination of laws.
Keep up to date with industry insights, analysis and reviews. Find out about the work of our expert teams and subscribe to receive our newsletters straight to your inbox.
Fresh thinking, sharper opinion.
We get straight to the point, managing complexity to get to the essentials. Our global network of offices covers every time zone.
No Content Set
Exception:
Website.Models.ViewModels.Components.General.Banners.BannerComponentVm
Insight
21 September 2017
Guernsey, Jersey
ON THIS PAGE
We are often asked to review employment contracts, including post-termination restrictions. It is increasingly common to see covenants that impose some form of restriction on the amount of shares an employee can hold or "be interested in" for other companies whilst they are still an employee. There is no problem with such clauses.
We also see a number of post-termination restrictions that either restrict the former employee from holding "any interest" in a competing business, or limiting the amount of shareholding that they can have. If your employment contracts use this language then this could lead to the entire restrictive covenant being unenforceable.
As a reminder, the legal position in relation to restrictive covenants in Guernsey and Jersey is very similar. Restrictive covenants are a restraint of trade and therefore they are unenforceable as a matter of public policy, unless the covenants protect a legitimate business interest and the covenant is no wider than necessary to protect that interest. The applicable principles in both islands are also comparable to those in England and, in the absence of local judgments, the Jersey courts will look to decisions from England (CPA v Keogh [2015] JRC091) and the Guernsey courts are likely to do the same. As a result, English decisions on restrictive covenants are likely to be persuasive in the courts in both islands.
A recent English Court of Appeal decision, Tillman v Egon Zehnder Limited [2017] EWCA Civ 1054, highlights the need to carefully consider how these clauses are drafted. The employer in this case was unable to enforce the restrictive covenants, and also ended up having to pay the former employee's legal costs. In this case there were two relevant restrictions:
"You shall not, during the course of your employment, directly or indirectly, hold or have any interest in, any shares or other securities in any company whose business is carried on in competition with any business of the Company or any Group Company, except that you may hold or have an interest in, for investment only, shares or other securities in a publicly quoted company of up to a maximum of 5 per cent of the total equity in issue of that company"
"You shall not without the prior written consent of the Company directly or indirectly, either alone or jointly with or on behalf of any third party and whether as principal, manager, employee, contractor, consultant, agent or otherwise howsoever at any time within the period of six months from the Termination Date:
- directly or indirectly engage or be concerned or interested in any business carried on in competition with any of the businesses of the Company or any Group Company which were carried on at the Termination Date or during such period"
The two clauses above would need to be read together, and it is clear from the contract that "interested in" was meant to include holding or purchasing shares. The Court of Appeal held that "interested in" must be given its ordinary and natural meaning. Even holding a single share in a listed company is sufficient for someone to have an interest for the purposes of the above clauses. The post-termination restriction therefore attempted to prevent former employees from holding any shares in any competing businesses. This was too wide a restriction and led to the whole restrictive covenant being unenforceable.
The two clauses also created a problem, as existing employees were entitled to hold up to 5% of the shareholding in a competing business, but former employees were not allowed any shares at all. This could not be justified and would create an anomalous situation.
The Court of Appeal was also of the view that the covenant attempted to restrict a former employee from being indirectly concerned with any competing business. The effect of this was similar to the attempt to prevent any interest in a competitor. Both phrases restricted any shareholding in a competitor and therefore the Court of Appeal held that the restrictive covenant was unenforceable.
As a result of this decision, we strongly suggest that you review your employment contracts, in particular the restrictive covenants, to see if they contain any wording that does or could be seen to attempt to restrict a former employee from holding shares in any other business. If so, then these covenants should be redrafted as a matter of urgency.
Helen Ruelle
Director of Local Legal Services | Legal
Jersey
Director of Local Legal Services
Jersey
Contact Helen
Back
Rachel DeSanges
Head of Employment, Guernsey | Legal
Guernsey, London
Head of Employment, Guernsey
Guernsey, London
Contact Rachel
Back
Will Austin-Vautier
Counsel | Legal
Jersey
Counsel
Jersey
Contact Will
Back
Laura Shirreffs
Senior Associate | Legal
Jersey
Senior Associate
Jersey
Contact Laura
Back
Ogier is a professional services firm with the knowledge and expertise to handle the most demanding and complex transactions and provide expert, efficient and cost-effective services to all our clients. We regularly win awards for the quality of our client service, our work and our people.
This client briefing has been prepared for clients and professional associates of Ogier. The information and expressions of opinion which it contains are not intended to be a comprehensive study or to provide legal advice and should not be treated as a substitute for specific advice concerning individual situations.
Regulatory information can be found under Legal Notice
Sign up to receive updates and newsletters from us.
Sign up
No Content Set
Exception:
Website.Models.ViewModels.Blocks.SiteBlocks.CookiePolicySiteBlockVm