Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

People

Big things are happening at Ogier. Change is embedded in everything we do. It is redefining our talent, our ways of working, our platforms of delivery, our culture.

Expertise

Services

We have the expertise to handle the most demanding transactions. Our commercial understanding and experience of working with leading financial institutions, professional advisers and regulatory bodies means we add real value to clients’ businesses.

View all services

Business Services Team

View all Business Services Team

Sectors

Our sector approach relies on smart collaboration between teams who have a deep understanding of related businesses and industry dynamics. The specific combination of our highly informed experts helps our clients to see around corners.

View all sectors

Locations

Ogier provides practical advice on BVI, Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Irish, Jersey and Luxembourg law through our global network of offices across the Asian, Caribbean and European timezones. Ogier is the only firm to advise on this unique combination of laws.

News and insights

Keep up to date with industry insights, analysis and reviews. Find out about the work of our expert teams and subscribe to receive our newsletters straight to your inbox.

Fresh thinking, sharper opinion.

About us

We get straight to the point, managing complexity to get to the essentials. Our global network of offices covers every time zone. 

No Content Set
Exception:
Website.Models.ViewModels.Components.General.Banners.BannerComponentVm

Beneficiaries' right to information

Insight

05 December 2018

Guernsey

Ogier is sponsoring the current lecture series by STEP Guernsey for the local fiduciary industry. In the recent 'Disclose or be damned' lecture Penningtons explained the UK's position on how a trustee should react when beneficiaries ask a trustee for documents or information relating to the trust. The lecture analysed the recent judgement laid down in Lewis v Tamplin [2018] EWHC 777 (ch) where it was decided that whether or not a certain document was disclosable depended on whether the document contained advice taken by the trustee which is not paid for out of the trust fund and which only benefits the trustees or whether the document relates instead to advice obtained for the benefit of the trust and is paid for out of the trust fund. The key point to note from the decision is that the person who is paying for the advice, and the person who benefits from the advice, dictates who may be granted access to those documents at a later date. You can find out more about STEP's Guernsey lecture series here.

In Guernsey, the statutory framework that governs this area is the Trusts (Guernsey) Law 2007 (the Law).

Section 26 of the Law creates a duty for trustees to keep accurate accounts and records of their trusteeship and provides that a trustee shall, at all reasonable times, at the written request of any beneficiary, provide full and accurate information as to "the state and amount of the trust property".

Subsection 26(2) addresses situations where the terms of the trust prohibit or restrict the trustees from giving any information relating to the state and amount of the trust property, providing that a trustee, beneficiary, trust official, or settlor may apply to the Royal Court for an order authorising or requiring the provision of information. For the court to make the order, it must be satisfied that doing so would be "necessary or expedient" for either:

(a) the proper disposal of any matter before court;

(b) for the protection of the interests of the beneficiary; or

(c) for the proper administration or enforcement of the trust.

In the case of Bathurst v Kleinwort Benson (Channel Islands) Trustees Ltd 2003-04 GLR N [32] the judge stated that a beneficiary has the right to ask trustees to disclose information and documents about trust assets and administration, and that this right does not simply arise from the trustees' duty to keep accounts, but arises as a matter of principle. The Court went further to say that if it were to exercise its discretion to order disclosure of certain documents, it could do so even in favour of an excluded beneficiary, so long as the documents related to periods when the excluded person was a named beneficiary and a potential object of disclosure by the trustees.

Although the Court's interpretation of the Law (and its predecessor, the Trusts (Guernsey) Law, 1989) has favoured beneficiaries in their requests for information from trustees in the past, the Royal Court noted in H.W. Trust Co. Ltd. V Cunningham 2005-06 GLR 349 that information pertaining to the destination of assets (eg following the transfer of the trust's main assets into a sub-trust) would normally fall outside the ambit of the legislative provisions. Despite this, it was decided in H.W. Trust Co. that the information as to the destination should be disclosed as it "was required in order to ensure that the assets had been properly administered in accordance with the trust's terms". Therefore, in these circumstances, and in situations where the applicant has a sufficient connection to the documents with respect to which disclosure is requested, the court may favour disclosure even if the information in question falls outside of the ambit of the legislative provisions.

Section 38 of the Law states that there are certain documents, such as letters of wishes and documents that reveal the deliberations of trustees in exercise of their powers, which the trustee is not obliged to disclose. However, again this is subject to any court order which may be made if the court is satisfied that disclosure of such documents would be "necessary or expedient" for the purposes mentioned above at points (a), (b) and (c).

To conclude, a beneficiary of a Guernsey trust always has the right to ask for information pertaining to the trust, and the trustees always have the duty to keep accounts. However the trustee does not always have to give out information if it does not pertain to the state and amount of the trust property. The Court has the power to step in in contentious situations so as to supervise, and where necessary, intervene.

About Ogier

Ogier is a professional services firm with the knowledge and expertise to handle the most demanding and complex transactions and provide expert, efficient and cost-effective services to all our clients. We regularly win awards for the quality of our client service, our work and our people.

Disclaimer

This client briefing has been prepared for clients and professional associates of Ogier. The information and expressions of opinion which it contains are not intended to be a comprehensive study or to provide legal advice and should not be treated as a substitute for specific advice concerning individual situations.

Regulatory information can be found under Legal Notice

No Content Set
Exception:
Website.Models.ViewModels.Blocks.SiteBlocks.CookiePolicySiteBlockVm